Health & Environment
Fri September 6, 2013
Environmental advocates say better staffing more important than Bond Act
The Environmental Committee Chairs in the legislature have proposed a $5 billion dollar environmental bond act, to be voted on in November 2014. But, at an Assembly hearing on the state’s environmental budget, advocates say a bigger concern is dwindling staff at the Department of Environmental Conservation.
Assembly Environmental Committee Chair Robert Sweeney is sponsoring a bill to create a $5 billion dollar environmental bond act to promote clean water, clean air and to preserve public land.
The bill, which is also sponsored by the Senate’s Environmental Committee Chair, is in the early stages of discussion.
But at a hearing on the budget for the Cuomo Administration’s Department of Environmental Conservation, known as the DEC, advocates expressed more concerns over the 30% reductions in staffing over the past several years.
Paul Gallay, with Hudson Riverkeeper, says the agency, which has suffered budget cuts for over a decade, now has 3000 employees, compared to a high of 4200 in the early 2000’s. And he says some essential tasks are not getting done, like the proper monitoring of water quality permits by industries that border New York’s lakes and rivers.
“We’re flying blind with regard to the bad actors,” Gallay said.
Gallay says he worked for the DEC in the 1990’s, and he says even with full staffing, many worked overtime to keep up with the demands.
“I call on you and I challenge you to investigate what the impacts have been ,” Gallay told the Assemblymembers at the committee.
Others praised the environmental agency for creating a pesticide registry, but lamented that there were not enough people to implement it.
Adrienne Esposito, with Citizens Campaign for the Environment, is from the south shore of Long Island and lived through Superstorm Sandy last year. She says DEC employees were taken from their regular tasks and assigned to work on storm recovery, which she greatly appreciates. But she says in a time of climate change, it’s important to have enough people to respond to weather disasters without disrupting other important tasks.
“I feel like sometimes the environmental agency is looked upon as this luxury item,” Esposito said. “That we can cut to the bone or do away with in in hard times. And that is a falsehood.”
Esposito, speaking afterward, says she does back a bond act, but says it has to be done right, with a realistic number of workers to carry it out.
“We’re doing less with less,” she said. “We can’t substitute a marketing phrase for real meaningful change here in New York.”
Environmental Commissioner Joe Martens did not testify, he sent a deputy commissioner instead. Assemblyman Sweeney devoted more questions to Deputy Commissioner Anne Reynolds on hydrofracking, than on the proposed bond act.
“Is there a time frame for some decision on fracking?” Sweeney asked.
Reynolds, answer, like those of her boss and others in the Cuomo Administration, was non committal.
“There isn’t a time frame at this point,” Reynolds said.
Reynolds says the agency is still working to answer 100,000 public comments submitted last January, and still waiting for Governor Cuomo’s Health Commissioner to finish a review that was begun nearly a year ago.
Esposito, with Citizens Campaign for the Environment, says while her group wants careful consideration of fracking, it’s taking attention away from other issues, like coping with climate change.